![\"Screen](\"http:\/\/www.economicfractalist.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/Screen-Shot-2019-10-27-at-10.58.20-AM.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nFrom the face page of the 2005 Economic Fractalist:<\/p>\n
The ideal growth fractal time sequence is X, 2.5X, 2X and 1.5-1.6X. The first two cycles include a saturation transitional point and decay process in the terminal portion of the cycles. A\u00a0<\/em><\/b>sudden nonlinear drop in the last 0.5x time period of the 2.5X is the hallmark of a second cycle and characterizes this most recognizable cycle.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n Expect the expected which the elegantly simple patterned science of saturation macroeconomics allows prediction.<\/p>\n The global asset debt macroeconomic system is elegantly quantifiable and deterministic in its intrinsic nature. Its assets grow in sequential fractal and sub fractal units \u00a0to their necessary maximum valuation saturation areas which underlying \u00a0debt expansion can produce with thereafter necessary devaluation in a Gompertz fractal manner.<\/p>\n Google\u2019s base fractal sequence (x) starting in 2004 self assembled itself into a classic Lammert Fractal 4 phase growth and decay series lasting 18 quarters. (see graph below: 3\/7\/6\/5 quarters =18 quarters) The maximum length of a second fractal series is 2.5 times the base sequence (x). \u00a0For Google with \u00a0a first fractal base sequence … Continue reading Google\u2019s 45 Quarter Second Fractal Terminal Expected Nonlinear Devaluation<\/span> <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"